Entries Tagged as 'Abortion'

Dead Baby, Dead Fish!

Some damn sad items today. In Oregon, Korena Elaine Roberts allegedly hit a pregnant Heather Snively over the head then cut into the woman’s womb and took her baby. Snively died either from blunt force trauma or the cut to the abdomen. The baby is also dead. We don’t know how the baby died, but EMS was sent to revive a new born after a call to 911 by Roberts.

Prosecutors consider this terrible crime to be one murder, because the baby technically is not alive or an individual since it was not separated from the mother. A Republican legislator is trying to introduce a bill to make this a two person murder, the mother and the baby, but is running afoul of those who think passage would ban abortions.

In Seattle, some are upset that dead fresh fish are being thrown about for entertainment at the tourist attraction Pike Place Fish Market. They’ve been invited to entertain at the American Veterinary Medical Association convention.

Chief executive Ron DeHaven said the Schaumburg, Ill.-based organization had thought inviting one of Seattle’s top tourist attractions — the fish-throwers at the Pike Place Fish Market — to the event would be a great “team-building experience.”

However People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) raised concerns about the ethics of using dead fish as props at a veterinary event. Apparently PETA thinks throwing the fish is disrespectful and wants rubber fish substituted.

Who on earth has time to worry about dead fish, when we need a way to punish those who kill babies.

Weasel Words

In the words of Homer Simpson:

“Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It’s what separates us from the animals … except the weasel.”

First, I am fighting Eminent Domain. When the state says, as in NC, “The bill, a response to the U.S. Supreme Court’s Kelo case, prohibits the condemnation of private property unless it will be used for an exclusive public use such as government purposes, public utilities or to eliminate blighted areas. Did you note the weasel words: unless, public use and blighted?

Second, I am fighting abortion in the third trimester. They want us to believe that no babies fetuses are delivered with all but the head showing and killed in the third trimester. Then they want us to believe that no doctor would order such a procedure except for “preserving the life or health of a mother”. Note the weasel words.

Third, I am fighting against UN sponsored ratification of the Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST). The treaty imposes limitations “on measures we might take to ensure our national security and homeland defense. If, for instance, foreign vessels operating on the high seas do not fit into one of three categories (i.e., they are engaged in piracy, flying no flag or transmitting radio broadcasts), LOST would prohibit U.S. Navy or Coast Guard vessels from intercepting, searching or seizing them,”…
Weasel words that take away our sovereignty. Read what Phyllis Schlafly thinks about the treaty.

Fourth, I am fighting against UN sponsored Convention on the Rights of the Child (CORC). CORC is a direct slap at families that prefer homeschooling to the statist schools. The governments wants all children to be indoctrinated in statist thinking and cannot control what is being taught in the home. So now we have CORC that apparently been approved byall countries except Somalia and the US.

The Brussels Journal wrote

Until two years ago, we never encountered any problems with the authorities concerning our family’s home education. In fact, compared to neighbouring countries, Belgium was very tolerant of homeschoolers. In 2003, however, the Flemish regional parliament decreed that all homeschoolers are obliged to sign a document in which they promise to rear their children along the lines of the UN Convention. The latter undermines the authority of parents and transfers it to the state.

The document the homeschoolers are made to sign also states that government inspectors decide whether families comply with the UN’s ideology. Furthermore, it contains a clause in which the homeschooling parents agree to send their child to an official government recognized school if the inspectors report negatively about them twice.

Let’s look at the CORC document. First, we have high sounding words:

Bearing in mind that the peoples of the United Nations have, in the Charter, reaffirmed their faith in fundamental human rights and in the dignity and worth of the human person, and have determined to promote social progress and better standards of life in larger freedom,

Then, “a child means every human being below the age of eighteen years” consider

Article 19
1. States Parties shall take all appropriate legislative, administrative, social and educational measures to protect the child from all forms of physical or mental violence, injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual abuse, while in the care of parent(s), legal guardian(s) or any other person who has the care of the child.

2. Such protective measures should, as appropriate, include effective procedures for the establishment of social programmes to provide necessary support for the child and for those who have the care of the child, as well as for other forms of prevention and for identification, reporting, referral, investigation, treatment and follow-up of instances of child maltreatment described heretofore, and, as appropriate, for judicial involvement.

Note all the weasel words.

In April, 2008, John Stossel reported

A California appellate court, ruling that parents have no constitutional right to homeschool their children, pinned its decision on this ominous quotation from a 47-year-old case, “A primary purpose of the educational system is to train schoolchildren in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare.”

What worries many about CORC is that government officials can decide if your child is suffering neglect or is abused because you are not instructing them in the proper core statist philosophies. The upshot is: your child can be taken away from you and placed in a foster home where the child can get the proper education. It’s for the children and the public’s safety.

The fear by some is that Barack Obama favors the UN and will have a democratic controlled congress that will ratify these two measures.

I’m afraid these highsounding documents are filled with weasel words that can be interpreted any way the state wants. One more reason to have judges appointed by someone who believes a strict interpretation of the Constitution.

An Examined Life

When my daughters were born, my first question about them, and I suspect yours too, was, “Are they healthy? Do they have all their fingers and toes” If they weren’t, if the child was born with Down’s Syndrome, for example, I imagine you cried for your child and for yourself. Most learned to love the child or loved the child from conception. Many or most, I suppose, were grateful for this child in your life and all that you shared with this child and learned from this child.

Science has given us tools to detect Down’s Syndrome and we can choose to abort the fetus. 90% choose abortion. Lawsuits are brought against doctor’s for not detecting the syndrome. Parents, for example, artificially impregnated, have brought suit for failure to test the egg or sperm donor. From an article at FindLaw written by Sherry F. Colb titled Better to Have Never Been Born? Wrongful Life Litigation

The more gut-wrenching form of wrongful life litigation occurs when the parents in question do want a child. They just don’t want this child.

HeroicLife at Truth, Justice, and the American Way

But what can we say about a parent that chooses a life of suffering upon their child?

HeroicLife argues, that now that we can detect birth defects, we pat ourselves on the back for being moral by choosing life. Is it moral to have the baby anyway, condemning the child to suffering?

Colb writes

Most of us believe that suffering is an evil, and that when suffering becomes intense enough, it might be worse than death. The prospect of death, for example, might not induce a prisoner of war to talk, but the threat of torture could. It is accordingly comforting to learn that a loved one’s death was “mercifully quick” rather than lengthy and painful.

We even have lawsuits brought in the name of the child born with a defect saying in effect, “I, the child who should not have been born, hereby sue the doctor whose negligence led to my existence.”

These sentiments express the view that at least under some circumstances, nonexistence might be better for the person who does not exist than life. It is not that the dead person has an identity in which he suffers less than his alter ego, the living and suffering version of him. Rather, it is that the suffering of the existing person is so great as to make life not worth living anymore, from that person’s own perspective.

Obama said that questions about when life begins, “Is above my pay grade!”

Socrates said, “An unexamined life is not worth living.” Science has given us great gifts. Could we not imagine an aborted child sue by saying in a sense, “I, the child who should have been born, hereby sue the doctor whose science led to my non-existence and prevented me from examining life as this child with these defects.”

After all, we all are born with defects, non of us are perfect. Some choose to believe being born a girl is defect, being born gay is a defect. Who knows maybe being born with a thinking brain is a defect!

No Partial-Birth Lawsuits Shows Abortion Advocates Lied About Health Exception

April 18 marked the one-year anniversary of the Supreme Court’s ruling in Gonzales v. Carhart, in which it rejected legal challenges to the
Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003.

While opponents of the ban claimed numerous lawsuits would be brought forth to challenge the Supreme Court’s ruling, thus far no challenges have been filed.

Indeed!

Why Is It Riskier For Women To Live In Oregon And Washington

Wasn’t there a Miss America winner who tried to bring attention to a connection between abortion and breast cancer? Yesterday, WorldNetDaily carried a story about the possible link.

A new study shows that abortions can be classified as carcinogens, because the number of breast cancer cases can be predicted reasonably accurately based on the number of abortions in a given population.

The study, “The Breast Cancer Epidemic: Modeling and Forecasts Based on Abortion and Other Risk Factors,” was done by Patrick S. Carroll of London-based research institute PAPRI and the results were published in the Journal of American Physicians and Surgeons this week.

It shows, that among risk factors, abortion is the “best predictor of breast cancer.” The results show that countries with higher abortions rates, such as England and Wales, higher breast cancer incidence is reported. “Where abortion rates are low (i.e. Northern Ireland and the Irish Republic) a smaller increase is expected,” the study said.

I have heard and read that Oregon has one of the highest rates of breast cancer in the nation. To test the theory I sought anecdotal evidence of a connection. (I realize people move around a lot and breast cancer can takes years to develop.)

Abortions per state

(AP) - Number of abortions per state in 1996, with the rate per 1,000 women:

* Alabama 13,826, 14
* Alaska 2,139, 15
* Arizona 11,016, 11
* Arkansas 5,882, 11
* California 280,180, 39
* Colorado 9,710, 11
* Connecticut 14,094, 20
* Delaware 4,482, 26
* District of Columbia 13,674, NA
* Florida 80,040, 27
* Georgia 35,790, 20
* Hawaii 4,916, 19
* Idaho 1,022, 4
* Illinois 53,613, 20
* Indiana 13,341, 10
* Iowa 7,602, 12
* Kansas 10,685, 19
* Kentucky 7,000, 8
* Louisiana 11,865, 12
* Maine 2,615, 9
* Maryland 12,363, 10
* Massachusetts 29,293, 21
* Michigan 30,208, 14
* Minnesota 14,193, 13
* Mississippi 4,206, 7
* Missouri 11,629, 10
* Montana 2,763, 15
* Nebraska 5,214, 14
* Nevada 6,965, 20
* New Hampshire 2,300, 8
* New Jersey 31,860, 18
* New Mexico 5,033, 13
* New York 152,991, 37
* North Carolina 33,554, 20
* North Dakota 1,291, 9
* Ohio 36,530, 15
* Oklahoma 6,769, 10
* Oregon 13,767, 20
* Pennsylvania 38,004, 15
* Rhode Island 5,437, 24
* South Carolina 9,326, 11
* South Dakota 901, 6
* Tennessee 17,989, 15
* Texas 91,470, 21
* Utah 3,639, 8
* Vermont 2,139, 16
* Virginia 25,770, 16
* Washington 26,138, 21
* West Virginia 2,470, 6
* Wisconsin 13,673, 12
* Wyoming 208, 2
* Total 1,221,585, 20

Oregon and Washington have 20 and 21 abortions per thousand, while California comes in at 39 per thousand. If you get away from the “Left Coast”, the rate of abortions per thousand drops dramatically.

Figure 1.4: Estimated New Cancers by State, 1998–2002

Alabama - 117
Montana - 130
Alaska - 136
Nebraska - 134
Arizona - 120
Nevada - 120
Arkansas - 121
New Hampshire - 137
California - 132
New Jersey - 136
Colorado - 136
New Mexico - 117
Connecticut - 143
New York - 130
Delaware - 130
North Carolina - 124
Dist. of Columbia - 139
North Dakota - 124
Florida - 126
Ohio - 129
Georgia - 124
Oklahoma - 130
Hawaii - 132
Oregon - 146
Idaho - 131
Pennsylvania - 132
Illinois - 133
Rhode Island - 132
Indiana - 128
South Carolina - 123
Iowa - 132
South Dakota - 131
Kansas - No data
Tennessee - No data
Kentucky - 127
Texas - 117
Louisiana - 123
Utah - 120
Maine - 132
Vermont - No data
Maryland - 132
Virginia - 123
Massachusetts - 143
Washington - 150
Michigan - 132
West Virginia - 119
Minnesota - 139
Wisconsin - 135
Mississippi - No Data
Wyoming - 124
Missouri - 127
United States - 131

There does seem to be some correlation, which in my mind would merit further study. When the breast cancer rate in Oregon and Washington is 10% higher than in the mountain states, one should ask whys it riskier to live on the West Coast?

Update:

It’s Now Clear to Me

Back in February of 2003 in the New Yorker there was an article Unspeakable Conversations, by Harriet McBryde Johnson. Ms Johnson is severely crippled, confined to a wheelchair, and a lawyer. In the article she has numerous debates in person and vis e-mail with Prof. Peter Singer of Princeton, often called the most influential philosopher of our time believes that babies should be aborted if they are impaired mentally or physically.

He wants to legalize the killing of certain babies who might come to be like me if allowed to live. He also says he believes that it should be lawful under some circumstances to kill, at any age, individuals with cognitive impairments so severe that he doesn’t consider them ”persons.”

I have refrained from posting about the Terri Schiavo case, frankly, because I couldn’t sort out the arguments or which side had truth on their side. I came across this article (hat tip to Free Republic) and suddenly things are clear…for me. Prof Singer Singer lays it all out.

The ”illogic” of allowing abortion but not infanticide, of allowing withdrawal of life support but not active killing. Applying the basic assumptions of preference utilitarianism, he spins out his bone-chilling argument for letting parents kill disabled babies and replace them with nondisabled babies who have a greater chance at happiness. It is all about allowing as many individuals as possible to fulfill as many of their preferences as possible.

IMO, it is just a short step from what is allowable today to “active killing”.

Little Earth Quakes

Earth Quakes You have to wonder, Did something get shaken loose on Dec 26th to cause this kind of activity around the Ring of Fire?

DATE-(UTC)-TIME Latitude Longitude Depth Magnitude Comments
yyyy/mm/dd hh:mm:ss degrees degrees km

2005/01/21 16:46:57 1.61S 80.89W 10.0 4.9 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

2005/01/21 16:15:05 1.28S 80.75W 10.0 4.5 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

2005/01/21 15:26:37 1.09S 80.68W 52.8 4.8 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

2005/01/21 13:45:14 1.12S 80.71W 10.0 6.0 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

2005/01/21 04:30:32 1.13S 80.74W 31.1 4.8 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

2005/01/20 19:07:17 1.18S 80.98W 32.4 4.6 NEAR COAST OF ECUADOR

Mover Mike

Richard Russell writes today in Dow Theory Letters Inc. (by subscription only)

Today, January 21, we find both the Industrials and the Transports (along with all the other major stock averages) below their lows of December 2004. In my book this is a very ominous situation, and one that does not bode well for either the stock market or the economy in 2005.

Mover Mike

Tim W Wood in China Syndrome has some surprising things to say about China, based on his technical analysis

So, my technical work is telling me that odds favor a down turn for China and potentially a significant one. I will add that there is a high likelihood that this down turn is about to begin unfolding and should be confirmed with a break below the October 2004 low.

At the outside I would say that the Hang Seng could perhaps hold on for one more intermediate term cycle advance as the divergence builds even more. But, in either case the Hang Seng is setting up for a major fall. These divergences are like pressure that builds up deep within the earth along the fault lines. The more the pressure builds the greater the earthquake that follows. Unless these technical conditions are corrected China is setting up for a financial earthquake. This quake could occur with a small reading on the Richter scale. But, current indications are that we should expect something of greater magnitude that may just rock the entire world.

I believe that China is about to enter Phase II of the great global bear market. If it’s actually true that China has been responsible for so much of the “recovery” since 2002 then imagine what might happen if they do see a down turn. You have been warned!

Mover Mike

Finally, Hundreds of Aborted Babies Buried in Colorado

Hundreds of parishioners have attended the twice-a-year services at their Wall of the Unborn. This year, the parish has invited the world with a news release.

“It impacts all of us,” LaVelle said, “and it impacts us to see the quantity of ashes that we bury each time.”

Little Earth Quakes

Mover Mike

Stranger and Stranger!

State to fight law that lets doctors refuse abortions

California’s attorney general will try to reverse a key victory for the pro-life lobby by suing to overturn a recently passed federal law designed to protect health care providers from retribution if they refuse to support abortion.

So, the state attorney general is trying to force doctors to perform abortions if they refuse. Stranger and stranger!
Mover Mike

Hairy toes give away N.C. shower peeper

A Greensboro man hiding in the women’s locker room Tuesday night was caught peeping after a woman in a neighboring shower stall spotted his hairy feet, authorities said.

As Roseanne Rosannadana said, “It’s always something!”
Mover Mike

Boo Bush, Yea Congressmen

Bush Administration Breaks Silence to Back Annan

The Bush administration expressed confidence in U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Thursday and said he should stay in office, in a belated rebuff to demands from Republicans in Congress for his resignation.

I voted for Bush, for this?
Mover Mike

I wasn’t aware that three courts had ruled against the Partial Birth Abortion Ban passed by Congress. I am glad to see

Members of Congress ask reversal of partial-birth abortion ruling.

Twenty-six Republican members of Congress asked an appeals court Thursday to reinstate the Partial Birth Abortion Ban Act, struck down by a federal judge in September.

snip

U.S. District Judge Richard Kopf in Nebraska ruled in September that the ban interferes with a woman’s right to an abortion and is unconstitutional. Kopf’s ruling followed decisions overturning the law by federal judges in New York and San Francisco. Those decisions also have been appealed.

Mover Mike

Michael O’Brien and Moral Values

My reading, lately, has branched afield. I came across the terms Moral Relativism and Moral Absolutism and that led to the writings of Michael O’Brien. I read, first, The Plague Journal and just finished Father Elijah. What brought this to mind was the Drudge headline Netherlands Hospital Euthanizes Babies. O’Brien argues from a Catholic perspective that the West is being propagandized to give up its values of right and wrong given to us by God and, consequently, is declining; values embodied in the Ten Commandments and The Seven Deadly Sins. Two things are especially repugnant to O’Brien, abortion (over 1.4 million babies are killed each year in this country) and euthanazia. What we have is a cultural divide in this country and this may be one reason for so much hate for President Bush and so much controversy about his faith.
Mover Mike