Ad tag:

Mover Mike

Mike is a retired stock broker, and now supports his wife's furniture business. He is her warehouseman, deluxer, and marketing guru. In addition, he writes poetry and finds abundance, health and joy in the world around him while pondering life's little mysteries

Mayor Tom Potter, Going for Number Three!
Mayor Tom Potter going for two defeats early in his first term, seeks permanent fix to school funding problem by floating the proposal of a regional tax for metro-area schools. According to The Oregonian, spending for the next two years is expected to be be between $5.22 Billion and $5.27 Billion statewide, $300 million more than the last two years.

Multnomah County has a little problem beginning in 2006-2007. A special tax expires at the end of 2005, leaving a $50 Million hole in the state's largest school district budget. I am sure officials are working on bringing the tax up for a vote to extend. However, the tax on a home valued at $300,000, will go down approximately $850 at expiration! How many in Multnomah County will reinstate that amount of tax? The state's largest school district sure could use the $100 Million raised in the county, but shipped to the less fortunate and smaller counties in the state. Where do we get these socialistic ideas:

"From each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs!" - Karl Marx
There is even some concern and a question, can you imagine, of exploring whether this regional tax to benefit the metro-area schools, can be assured that all or most of the money stays within the district! How selfish!

No where in the discussion is there an answer to one big question. I understand why Beaverton and Hillsboro need more money for schools. Their school population is exploding. But the population of the state's largest school district has been flat to declining for years. Why do you need more money when the state's largest school district's school board keeps consolidating local schools.

Good luck, Mayor Potter. This is number two for you. What have you got up your sleeve for number three?

Ad tag:
Posted by movermike on Friday July 22, 2005 at 12:54pm
Ron Ledbury (mail) (www):
The current two year contract that covers the 2004-2005 and 2005-2006 school years is based on knowingly incorrect revenue data too. The school board choose not to put the continuation of the tax up for a vote. Their offer of pay and such presumed that source of income. One need not even consider ideology to resolve this little mess, just elementary accounting and budgeting 101.

That's before factoring in PERS . . .
7.22.2005 5:37pm